Hand Count Arapahoe
The Solution
Historical ballot boxes used in Arapahoe County were transparent. All voters were allowed to see what was, and wasn't, in the box.
Transparent Elections
Everyone used to hand count paper ballots, back before election machines (which go back further than you might think) and back then it did NOT take weeks to count! In many ways we are just returning to a solid system of community involvement that used to exist all over America.
The secret is decentralization, which is an important feature of American government generally (the general principle is that the local official has the highest power within that locality). The average precinct in America only has about 1000 voters. At 50% turnout, that's only 500 ballots, which you have 5 hours to count from 7PM to midnight on Election Night. Estimates are that a team of 10 could count 600 ballots in that time.
That means 1% of voters volunteering a few hours of time on Election Night - is your calendar open on November 3rd, 2026?
Real Voters
If the voters aren't real, their votes can't be real, and a good count of fake votes is still a fake result.
Like other parts of the election, voter list maintenance needs to be returned to the lowest level, where the job is manageable - the precinct.
On Election Day the precinct polling station should have a clean printed voter list for the precinct to check IDs against - the list should never be changeable in realtime.
Voters should show up in person with government-issued ID so poll workers are able to verify the ID is genuine, it matches the voter, and the voter is eligible.
Real Votes
When ballots are cast in person by verified voters, collected in a transparent box that anyone can see had nothing in it before the first ballot dropped, and those ballots are counted in place immediately after polling closes, everyone can see those are real votes.
Real Counts
There are several tested methods of hand counting; one that has been tested in Colorado, especially in Arapahoe County, is the Rocky Mountain Method.
Teams of counters take ballots through a three-stage process, batching (putting ballots in groups of 25 or less), tallying (summarizing one batch on a tally sheet, by marking the choices for each ballot and adding up the totals), and aggregating (entering each set of tally totals on an aggregation sheet, and adding the totals). Every step is double-checked (at least) in process.
The final package of ballots, tally sheets, and aggregation sheets is a completely auditable physical record; anyone could re-create the count by going back through the whole set to check the numbers.
Must-Haves for Transparent Elections
In general, you should aim to minimize time and space for the vulnerable period between when ballots are cast and counted, and maximize public view during this vulnerable period. Minimize complexity - the average citizen should be able to understand everything that happens - and maximize simplicity - the fewer the moving parts, the more robust the system.
Transparency requires:
-
Physical ballots (you can go back and audit them)
-
In-person voting (you can control the secrecy of the vote and the chain of custody)
-
Hand counted (the citizens count, and verify, the vote count)
-
Hand counted where cast (never move ballots with unknown contents)
-
Hand counted where cast at the precinct level (the more people watching, the harder to buy off everyone)
-
IDs verified for both registration and voting (keep ineligible voters away from the ballots)
-
One-day election (never store ballots with unknown contents)
-
Open to the public (any citizen of the precinct should be able to watch what happens to their ballot from the time cast to the time counted)
Why Vote at Precinct Level
"Traditional precinct-based systems operate at a human scale: each precinct has a bounded list of eligible voters, and poll workers often develop familiarity with local patterns and voter identity over time. This structure makes it easier to notice irregularities, resolve address questions, and reconcile lists in a transparent end-of-day process."
"Studies of jurisdictions that moved from precinct-based voting to vote centers find turnout increases in some places and decreases in others, with effects that vary by county type and population. In several cases, any convenience benefit appears to accrue mainly to already-consistent voters, while less-frequent voters and those facing transportation barriers do not see comparable gains."
"Proponents of vote centers often justify consolidation by citing reduced costs: fewer locations, fewer poll workers, and fewer pieces of equipment. However, these claims typically assume jurisdictions will invest in sophisticated electronic pollbooks and high-capacity voting devices, which are expensive to purchase, maintain, and regularly upgrade."
